Software Option for
Plus versions
Heat of Hydration Analysis
Version 14.2 of LUSAS Civil &
Structural and LUSAS Bridge products permit modelling the heat of hydration of
concrete for a variety of cement types. Effects due to the addition of
fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag can also be included.
When used in conjunction with Nonlinear, Dynamic, and Thermal software
options the heat of concrete hydration can be computed during a
thermo-mechanical coupled analysis and the temperatures and degree of
hydration can be read in to the mechanical analysis. Currently the
mechanical properties of the concrete can only be defined as a
function of temperature.
Overview
The concrete heat of hydration facility
mplemented in LUSAS caters for cement types I, II, III
and V. Effects due to use of fly ash and ground granulated blast
furnace slag can also be taken into account. Although the mechanical
properties of concrete cannot be directly linked to the degree of
hydration, it is possible to define concrete properties that are
appropriate for the time when the greatest temperature differential
occurs. Typically this occurs between 24 and 48 hours so mechanical
properties appropriate for this time interval could be specified to
assess any possibility of cracking. The implementation allows you to
enter the chemical composition for any cement type should the need
arise. Heat of hydration results from LUSAS have been validated
against academic research (carried out by Schindler and Folliard) and also against a standalone commercial
heat of hydration program.
Heat of hydration example : Test cube
| This
quality assurance test case, whilst simplistic, illustrates the
benefit of using this facility perfectly. A cube of concrete is
modelled with an 8x8x8 mesh of HF8/HX8 elements and the concrete
curing process is simulated. Temperatures due to the heat of
hydration can be obtained by examining the hourly timestep
results. From the results it could be seen that the greatest temperature
differential occurs at 35 hours. A structural analysis using a
concrete cracking model based upon mechanical properties for
this time interval is then carried out and cracks can be
observed when differential expansion is enough to cause
principal stresses that lead to material failure. In this
example the external thermal boundary conditions were chosen to
emphasize the heat gradient across the concrete block, and in
the structural analysis the block is free to expand
unrestrained. |

|
|
Animation of
temperature change in mid-section of concrete block
|
 |
 |
|
Crack planes at 35
hours |
Maximum principal
stresses at 35 hours |
Application example: Dam construction
Heat of hydration analysis and a
semi-coupled structural analysis is carried out on a simple testcase
model of a dam that is constructed in three stages. Results for the
heat of hydration analysis are plotted on section slices through the
model. Structural analysis results include the effects caused by an
aging Young’s Modulus as a result of defining concrete creep
properties.
Heat of Hydration example : Dam
 |
 |
 |
|
Maximum
temperature differential in first casting stage |
Maximum
temperature differential in second casting stage |
Maximum
temperature differential in third casting stage |
Semi-coupled Thermal / Structural
example : Dam
 |
 |
 |
| Maximum surface
stress in first casting stage |
Maximum surface
stress in second casting stage |
Maximum surface
stress in third casting stage |
Back to Top
|