Engineering analysis and design software
Civil and Structural engineering

Case Study

Core wall analysis of University College London Hospital

  • Static analysis of a jump formed reinforced concrete core

  • Global and local analysis using shell and solid elements

  • Stress distribution and displacements evaluated

The design and construction of the new University College London Hospital was undertaken by a joint venture comprising Amec Group, Balfour Beatty Construction and Haden Young.  The first construction phase, which included a 22 storey tower and a 5 storey adjacent structure, was completed in 2005. Clarke Nicholls Marcel were responsible for the engineering design and used LUSAS Consultancy Services to build a 3D model of the 22 storey, reinforced concrete core in order to assess, as accurately as possible, the interaction between the various core elements which change properties throughout the building’s height. Gravity loads were applied at the various levels of the tower and combined with notional horizontal loads also acting at the floor levels. From the LUSAS analyses, overall wall stresses, local conditions around significant openings and global tower displacements were obtained and these confirmed CNM’s assumptions of stress distribution.


Six interconnecting sets of jump formed walls form the central core of the structure. The walls are predominantly 200mm thick, with a few of 300mm and 400mm thicknesses. In modelling the core using LUSAS Civil & Structural, 3D thick shell elements represented the walls. Joint elements were used at each floor level of the core to apply notional horizontal loadings and also used to specify restraint conditions for the global horizontal x and y directions in order to 'lock' the structural deformations at each floor level.  These special support conditions required the removal of constraint in the vertical z-direction for the rigid supports so that the vertical deformations across the floor plan could vary.  Elements in each 'lift' of core wall were grouped together to allow the display of each core level in isolation to help simplify the model building process and the viewing of results. In all, over 40,000 thick shell and joint elements were used to model the core. In addition to the global model of the whole core, local models using solid elements investigated potential high stress concentrations around selected openings including service holes and single and double jacking pockets in the 200mm walls.

Typical core wall thicknesses


Five separate loadcases consisting of core self weight, uniformly distributed, dead and live loads and a notional load of a specified value acting in North, South, East and West directions were applied to the model at each floor level. By combining and factoring these loadcases at the results processing stage nine design load combinations were formed. From these combinations resultant displacements, in-plane shear stress resultants and direct membrane stress resultants were obtained for each level of the core to aid Clarke Nicholls Marcell in their design.


Because of the complexity of the model generated for this project, with its 9 load combinations, 22 separate floors and large number of walls the output of actual stresses at top, middle and bottom surfaces of the thick shell elements would have generated a large number of results plots requiring investigation. So, in order to simplify the results produced, contour plots of stress resultants were produced instead. With these the actual stress at a location in a wall is obtained by dividing the stress resultant value by the corresponding wall thickness.

For all walls in the core, and under all load combinations, the stress ranges given by the LUSAS Civil & Structural analysis compared well with those predicted by less advanced calculation methods. The direct compressive stress resultants confirmed that the greatest magnitudes were being carried by the thicker wall sections. It was also found that some of the 200mm walls had significantly higher stress levels than others of the same thickness. The ability of LUSAS to produce level by level stress results and highlight disproportionate wall loadings can give useful guidance on the appropriateness of the wall thickness used for these types of core-walled structures.

View from under core of contours of Nx for Combination 2

Compressive stress and in-plane shear stress at Level 0

Deformed and Undeformed core walls at roof level

John Wilson, Partner responsible at Clarke Nicholls Marcel said: "Although CNM has a relatively powerful FE capacity in-house we felt it made sense due to the large amount of data input to use LUSAS to set-up what is a complicated model and analyse it within a minimum timescale. The results from LUSAS, which were presented with very clear graphics, enabled us to be completely confident that our assumptions on stress distribution and hence reinforcement design were correct."

The results from LUSAS, which were presented with very clear graphics, enabled us to be completely confident that our assumptions on stress distribution and hence reinforcement design were correct."

John Wilson, Prolect Partner at Clarke Nicholls Marcel 


Other LUSAS Civil & Structural case studies:


Software Information

LUSAS is a trademark and trading name of Finite Element Analysis Ltd. 
Copyright 1982 - 2017 LUSAS. Last modified: March 14, 2017. Privacy policy

Any modelling and analysis capabilities described on this page are dependent upon the LUSAS software product and version in use.