Engineering analysis and design software
Bridge design and engineering

Case Study

Dynamic Analysis of the Hungerford Footbridges

  • cable stay footbridges
  • dynamic analysis
  • assessment for deliberate vandalism

Hungerford footbridges. London

Westminster City Council organised an international design competition in 1996 on behalf of the Cross River Partnership, a group formed by public and private bodies whose aim is to promote links across the Thames. The winning team comprised engineers WSP Group and architects Lifschutz Davidson. The scheme consists of two new footbridges, one on each side of Charing Cross railway bridge, and two link bridges which connect the South Bank to the Surrey pier of the railway bridge. LUSAS Bridge was used to calculate the dynamic response of the bridges and to generate the parameters for wind tunnel tests.

The two multi-span main footbridges are 320m long and 4.7m wide. They comprise pre-stressed concrete edge beams connected by a structural slab and downstand ribs. The decks are suspended using arrays of cable stay rods from inclined steel pylons. Steel cable backstays hold the 25m high pylons at the correct inclination, and piled foundations provide vertical support.

Groups of Members as Defined in LUSAS

Using LUSAS, an eigenvalue analysis was initially undertaken and a series of closely spaced mode shapes were extracted; the fundamental mode was found to be at 0.82 Hz. This was considered low enough to cause concern and therefore a series of transient (step-by-step) dynamic analyses were performed. The main bridges were firstly checked against the limiting value of acceleration, due to a 180N sinusoidal dynamic load, specified in the UK's Department of Transport Standard BD 37/88. Secondly in order to assess the effects of deliberate vandalism, the acceleration due to a group of people jumping up and down at the lowest natural frequency of the deck was also assessed. The same limiting acceleration value permitted by the sinusoidal dynamic load assessment was used and measured adjacent to the nearest jumping person. It was assumed that, if a group of people cannot cause appreciably large accelerations that can be felt by others, then nobody else will join in. In both instances the results were found to be in accordance with the code requirements and at an acceptable level for pedestrian comfort.

Animation of primary mode shape (exaggerated)

The data from the eigenvalue extraction was later used to generate the parameters for the wind tunnel tests. Testing was necessary to investigate the susceptibility of the bridge decks to aerodynamic behaviour. A ‘sectional model’ was used - effectively a 2D representation of the bridge. Although this simplification did not allow modelling of some of the more complex aspects of the bridges’ behaviour, a 3D model would have been restricted to two or three spans because of the size of the largest available tunnel. Furthermore, computer analysis showed that a three span model would have behaved quite differently to the full bridge. The wind tunnel tests gave favourable results, demonstrating a critical wind speed well in excess of the speed expected for the site; wind induced vibrations should not be noticeable.

The Hungerford footbridges give London a genuinely useful and attractive new river crossing, and a fitting landmark for the new millennium.

Hungerford Footbridge

 

Other LUSAS Bridge case studies:

York Millennium Footbridge

 

Software Information

  Bridge / Bridge plus
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software overview
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Modelling in general
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Advanced elements, materials and solvers
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Load types and combinations
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Staged construction modelling
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Geotechnical / Soil-structure modelling
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Analysis and design
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Design code facilities
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Viewing results
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software customisation

  Bridge LT
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software overview

  Videos
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes)

  Choosing Software
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software products
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) LUSAS Bridge LT
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) LUSAS Bridge
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) LUSAS Bridge Plus
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software selection

  Software Options
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Click to see index
 
  Case Studies
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes)

  Additional Information
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Linear and nonlinear buckling analysis
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Curved girder analysis
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Integral or jointless bridges
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Post-tensioning
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Concrete modelling
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Interactive Modal Dynamics
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) LUSAS Programmable Interface (LPI)

  General information
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Hardware specification
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Licencing and Networking options
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Software prices
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Documentation
green_arrow.gif (94 bytes) Links page
 

Request information

 


LUSAS is a trademark and trading name of Finite Element Analysis Ltd. 
Copyright 1982 - 2017 LUSAS. Last modified: March 09, 2017. Privacy policy

Any modelling and analysis capabilities described on this page are dependent upon the LUSAS software product and version in use.